Targeted Micro Geometry Scattering in Generating Grinding for Gear Noise Optimization

Image source: WZL, RWTH Aachen University

Comparison between profile grinding and generating grinding of cylindrical gears with regard to manufacturing of targeted micro geometry scattering


Highly efficient and quiet transmissions are vital for modern powertrains, especially with growing demands in electric mobility. Recent research highlights how targeted micro geometry scattering on cylindrical gears can lower tonal noise and provide a more pleasant acoustic experience. This article presents key insights from a newly developed methodology for designing a grinding tool that realizes these micro geometry variations in continuous generating grinding. The present study investigates the innovative concept of enhancing Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) behavior, thereby paving the way for optimized gear performance.

Figure 1: Process sequence of the developed method. Picture sources: [7, 8]

Background: Why Micro Geometry Matters

Gear transmissions are complex systems where minute variations in tooth flank geometry can significantly affect noise levels and overall drivetrain quality. As vehicle powertrains become quieter, especially in electric propulsion, gear noise increasingly stands out. Reducing tonal components, which the human ear finds particularly annoying, is a key challenge. Conventional approaches rely on uniform flank modifications, but these often fail to address tonal excitations adequately. Recent studies show that scattering micro geometry - varying parameters like flank crowning and tip relief from tooth to tooth - can reduce dominant noise peaks. This scattered approach creates more random excitation, leading to a noticeable decline in tonal noise. [1–4]
 

The Proposed Method

The newly devised methodology revolves around a reverse calculation process that transforms a specified gear flank geometry back into a tool topography for the continuous generating grinding procedure [5]. The presented method addresses these issues by systematically deriving the ideal grinding worm geometry based on the target micro geometry scattering. Each tooth flank design is reverse engineered into distinct generating profiles, which are then merged to form a single or multi-start grinding worm. This facilitates a uniform shift strategy aimed at minimizing interference between adjacent tool profiles. By integrating dressing a gear concept, the approach ensures a precise, reproducible way to impart tooth-specific micro geometries without extending production cycle times unnecessarily. In practice, this means manufacturers can replicate the desired modifications more consistently, while preserving the advantages of the fast continuous generating grinding process [6]. As a result, gears can be produced with high accuracy and reliably varied deviations without sacrificing throughput. 
 

Implementation Highlights

In application, the process begins with a defined gear geometry that incorporates unique profile or lead crownings for each tooth. A set of helical contact lines is generated, capturing the exact positions where the grinding worm would engage each flank. Through a mathematical rolling condition, these flank points are mapped back to the tool’s normal section. Sophisticated transformations correct for center distance or helix angle shifts, ensuring each profile segment properly reflects the selected micro geometry, see Figure 1.

Finally, the assembled tool geometry is validated by rolling it forward once again to produce a virtual gear and comparing it against the original reference. Even with variations in crowning values or lead angle modifications, the method can keep dimensional offsets to a minimum. Adjusting the kinematic sequence of the reverse calculation further helps distribute modifications evenly, thereby maintaining control over the final flank topography while lowering undesirable noise amplitudes.

Figure 2: Comparison of loaded total transmission error spectra

Practical Benefits

One of the most notable outcomes is a more random excitation pattern, reducing the sharp peaks typical of gear mesh orders, see Figure 2. The result is a transmission whose prominent tonal components are less discernible to the human ear, thereby enhancing the subjective driving experience. Furthermore, unlike some profile grinding methods, this approach preserves the inherent productivity advantage of continuous generating grinding. By utilizing a dressing gear and shifts along the tool’s axis, production steps remain efficient [9].

Besides immediate gains like lower noise levels and improved comfort, the method also carries potential sustainability benefits by minimizing rework and generating fewer defective parts. As the technique integrates seamlessly with existing machine setups, the barrier to adoption is relatively low.

Conclusion and Outlook

This concept of manufacturing targeted micro geometry scattering promises a fresh route to gear noise optimization without sacrificing throughput or product quality [4]. By systematically calculating and shaping the grinding worm, manufacturers can create gears with consistent yet targeted varied modifications - a proven strategy for mitigating tonal gear noise. Ongoing research is exploring how additional kinematic refinements might yield even finer control over the flank form. Experimental studies on the manufacturing of targeted micro geometry scattering in the continuous generating grinding process are pending for future research work.

Alexander Mann M.Sc., M.Sc.

Research Associate in the group of Gearbox NVH, Gear Technology, Chair of Machine Tools at Werkzeugmaschinenlabor WZL of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Christian Westphal M.Sc

Chief Engineer, Head of Gear Technology, Chair of Machine Tools at Werkzeugmaschinenlabor WZL of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Christian Brecher

Head of Chair of Machine Tools at Werkzeug-
maschinenlabor WZL of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

References

1. Zeller P. Handbuch Fahrzeugakustik: Grundlagen, Auslegung, Berechnung, Versuch. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg; 2018.
2. Brecher C, Löpenhaus C, Ahmad M. Analysis of the Dynamic Excitation Behavior of High Speed Transmissions. In: Brecher C, Klocke F, editors. 7th WZL Gear Conference in the USA; 18.-19. Juli 2017; Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1st ed. Aachen: Apprimus; 2017.
3. Genuit K. Sound-Engineering im Automobilbereich: Methoden zur Messung und Auswertung von Geräuschen und Schwingungen. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
4. Kasten M, Brimmers J, Brecher C. Psychoacoustic Optimization of Gear Noise - Chaotic Scattering of Micro Geometry and Pitch on Cylindrical Gears. Gear Tech. 2021:54–65.
5. Litvin FL, Fuentes A. Gear geometry and applied theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
6. Schriefer H. Kontinuierliches Wälzschleifen von Verzahnungen. 1st ed. Wallisellen: Reishauer; 2008.
7. Klocke F, Brecher C. Zahnrad- und Getriebetechnik: Auslegung, Herstellung, Untersuchung, Simulation. 2nd ed. München: Hanser; 2024.
8. Brimmers J. Funktionsorientierte Auslegung topologischer Zahnflankenmodifikationen für Beveloidverzahnungen [Diss.]. Aachen: RWTH Aachen University; 2020.
9. Türich A. Abrichtpotenziale genutzt beim Zahnrad-Wälzschleifen: Abrichten mit Diamanträdern. WB Werkstatt + Betrieb. 2006:54–7.

Jump back to the top of the page